This website is now archived. While it is fully functioning, I no longer maintain it and comments are turned off on most posts. Please visit the updated LloydMorgan.co.uk.

Category Archives: Politics

A Blueprint for Generation Y (Death & Taxes: That’s All That’s For Certain)

1

The true measure of a nation’s standing is how well it attends to its children – their health and safety, their material security, their education and socialization, and their sense of being loved, valued, and included in the families and societies into which they are born.

UNICEF – Child Poverty in Perspective: An Overview of Child Well-Being in Rich Countries.

When the United Nation’s Children’s Fund released their report on child well-being in industrialised nations earlier this year, UK politicos were justifiably nervous – with the report tarnishing the UK’s foreign image as a Mary-Poppins-esque kid-friendly country, the aim of keeping the report from the mainstream media’s attention was a relatively high priority for the government.

Measured on 6 ‘dimensions’ and drawing on 40 separate indicators relating to children’s rights, lives, and overall well-being, the UK came last: twenty-first out of the twenty-one selected OECD countries. The report makes for a very sobering read, of which the BBC did a good job of summing up. If you’re American, don’t go feeling smug about this though; as Neal Lawson of Compass – New Labour’s think-tank – said:

The reason our children’s lives are the worst among economically advanced countries is because we are a poor version of the USA, so the USA comes second from bottom and we follow behind. The age of neo-liberalism, even with the human face that New Labour has given it, cannot stem the tide of the social recession capitalism creates.

The best commentary on this report I’ve read so far was written by Maria Hampton of Cambridge (UK) for Adbusters. I could quote this article all day and never get bored, but instead I implore you to go and read it yourself, please. Yes, it’s relatively long, but it is easily the most thought-provoking article I’ve read so far this year. The sensationalism ends with the headline (‘Generation F*cked: How Britain is Eating its Young’), and instead the author allows the facts and figures to speak for themselves – and that they do.

As Richard Esguerra fears, this article lays out a blueprint that our countries seem to be drawing for Generation Y (that’s you and I: the children of the baby-boomers). A narrowing of our cultural experiences coupled with the by-products of ‘neocapitalism’, such as “overpowering consumerism [and the] decline of public value (like public spaces or the public domain)” makes for a grim future that the more socialist Nordic countries appear to be bypassing – or at worst, delaying.

I don’t know what else to say on this matter, so I will pass it over to you with this final quote:

The first stirrings of major intergenerational conflict are already being noted. The basic rights of the recent past – a safe job, free education and healthcare, secure homes to raise a family, a modest but comfortable old age – have slipped quietly away, all to be replaced by a myriad of vapid lifestyle choices and glittery consumer trinkets. Excluded from a national social housing scheme sold off by their parents, unwilling to give birth in the UK’s draconian new system of rental accommodation which gives tenants no more than six months grace from eviction, and unable to afford homes of their own in 85 percent of the country, today’s iPod generation is stunted: trapped halfway between childhood and adulthood. It now takes them until 34, on average, before they can afford a house, let alone have a family of their own. Little surprise that they are such woeful models of grown-up responsibility for their younger siblings to emulate. Mom and Dad aren’t much better. By blowing their children’s inheritance on 80 percent of the UK’s luxury good purchases, from SUVs to cruises and anti-wrinkle creams, Britain’s baby-boomers seem hell bent on ensuring that, even without the coming resource shortages such as Peak Oil, their offspring will be the first generation in living memory to have a lowered standard of living.

Update: Edited and re-posted to Lone Gunman. Updated two links (Adbusters‘ article and Richard Esguerra’s blog post) to Internet Archive links.

The Seven Blunders and Wonders of the World

1

Seven Wonders of the WorldTo the right, you can see the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World as depicted by the 16th-century artist, Marten Heemskerk: Great Pyramid of Giza, Hanging Gardens of Babylon, Temple of Artemis, Statue of Zeus at Olympia, Mausoleum of Maussollos, Colossus of Rhodes and the Lighthouse of Alexandria (left to right, top to bottom).

On 7th July 2007, the New Open World Corporation released an updated ‘contemporary version’ of this list amidst a fair bit of controversy; specifically their (non-)profit status, their supposed links with UNESCO, and the voting process. This UNESCO statement, distancing the UN from the initiative, is pretty self-explanatory:

There is no comparison between Mr. Weber’s mediatised campaign and the scientific and educational work resulting from the inscription of sites on UNESCO’s World Heritage List. The list of the 7 New Wonders of the World will be the result of a private undertaking, reflecting only the opinions of those with access to the internet and not the entire world. This initiative cannot, in any significant and sustainable manner, contribute to the preservation of sites elected by this public.

This, coupled with the ambiguity of the corporation’s profit/non-profit status (which is dubious at best) and the fact that votes are ‘bought’ and can be excluded without due cause, makes it all a bit of a debacle. Of course, that didn’t stop the media, and the final list was released to much fanfare: Chichen Itza (Yucatán, Mexico), Christ the Redeemer (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), Great Wall of China, Machu Picchu (Cuzco, Peru), Petra (Jordan), Colosseum (Rome, Italy), Taj Mahal (Agra, India) and the Great Pyramid of Giza (Egypt).

Quite why more ‘modern’ architectural accomplishments made the final seven (Christ the Redeemer, the Colosseum and the Taj Mahal) rather than more wondrous relics such as Angkor Wat (Angkor, Cambodia), Rapa Nui’s Moai (Easter Island, Chile) and Stonehenge (Amesbury, England) isn’t for me to discuss as it’s undoubtedly due to the voting system. What I do want to discuss is a completely different list…

The Seven Blunders of the World, by Mahatma Gandhi

This list was compiled by Gandhi and presented to his grandson on their last day together, shortly before his assassination. I like to think of it as an updated ‘contemporary version’ of the seven deadly sins. It was created as a search for the roots of violence in society – acts of passive violence.

  • Wealth without work
  • Pleasure without conscience
  • Knowledge without character
  • Commerce without morality
  • Science without humanity
  • Worship without sacrifice
  • Politics without principle

Gandhi’s grandson, Arun Gandhi, later added an eighth ‘blunder’ to the list:

  • Rights without responsibilities

If you could ‘vote’ for another, or for the most important of the above, what would you go for? I think it’s an interesting question.

Using Reverse Interrogations to Detect Liars

Comments Off

Through MindHacks I just read an interesting article in The Times regarding new research that shows how, in police interrogations, asking the interviewee to tell their story in reverse can help detect a lie – or more accurately, in detecting the stress patterns of a liar under ‘cognitive load’.

It’s an interesting idea and – quite frankly – is obvious once the theory has been pointed out to you. However, as some of those who have commented on the original Times article point out, the issue of false positives could be a serious problem if this technique is relied upon exclusively. It won’t be, of course, as even now police interviews are only a small part of an investigation, so without any evidence you’re not going to be going anywhere near a courtroom just because ‘they thought you were lying’!

I personally think it’s a great idea when (intelligent) psychologists are employed to come up with novel ways to detect this type of behaviour and we need to see more people in power talking to experts in other fields too. These experts are infinitely more qualified to come up with ideas like this (in their own field) than politicians or ‘classically trained’ police officers. It could bring an end to the so-called movie-plot threats that people are warned of on a seemingly daily basis.

McJob – Don’t Blame the Dictionaries

Comments Off

Unless you’ve been hiding under the literary rock for the past month or so, you have undoubtedly heard about the “McJob” dispute that is taking hold in dictionary houses around the world. However, as you’re all literary proles, I feel that I should probably brief you:

The current definition of a McJob – according to the Oxford English Dictionary – is “an unstimulating, low-paid job with few prospects, especially one created by the expansion of the service sector“. Basically, we’re talking about a rubbish job where you spend all day serving others, getting little in return. Job satisfaction is low and suicide rates are high… I would imagine.

As you can guess, a certain restaurant chain isn’t best pleased with this definition, and late last year decided that they were going to publicly challenge this definition with a PR campaign (“Not bad for a McJob”) and a public petition. Their goal was to get the word removed or the definition changed – three years after it first appeared in dictionaries and twenty years after its first use.

Six months later, the plight of the McJob was again raised by a number of people in a letter to the Financial Times last Thursday, calling for the removal of the word or at least an amendment of its definition. This letter was signed by Sir Digby Jones – Skills Envoy to the CBI – along with a number of CEOs, Director Generals, MPs and professors in institutions around the UK.

McDonalds photo by monkeyc.net (via flickr dot com)I can’t help but feel they are wasting their time.

Do they not realise that a dictionary presents definitions of words that are commonly used in speech and writing: the accepted lexicon of a generation? The dictionaries are not at fault for putting McJob in the dictionary… the people are. Do they really blindly believe that dictionaries abuse their position to make social commentary or to engage in corporate discrimination?

It is with this that I would like to thank Prof. Alex Callinicos for his reply: the common-sense, logical argument that was printed in the FT the next day, pointing out the Orwellian aspects of corporations and policy-makers requesting changes to the dictionary.

If McDonalds and all the other complainers want to see a change, they have to work to remove this – supposedly false – stereotype of the service industry’s jobs, not attempt to get it removed from the dictionary. If it is removed from common usage, or its definition when used is changed, the dictionaries will follow.

McDonald’s McJob Petition
“A new definition of ‘McJob’ with a side order of skills and opportunities” – Sir Digby Jones and others
“Orwellian tones of rebranding McJob” – Prof. Alex Callinicos
Wikipedia’s ‘McJob’ entry

Something for the Weekend

Comments Off

A few links to keep you online this weekend:

  • http://www.thenation.com/special/bigten.html

    We all (should) know that the majority of the world’s media holdings are owned by a handful of media conglomerates, but this is a novel way to display the information.

    Albeit slightly outdated (1991), Mark Crispin Miller’s article and the corresponding visual shows vividly how in the early 1990s America’s media was majority owned by just ten corporations. However, in the 16 years since its publication not much has changed – but now 90% of America’s media is owned by not ten, but just six of these corporations that have grown tremendously: Disney, Viacom, AOL Time Warner, News Corp., Bertelsmann AG and General Electric.

    Wonder why this matters? Read about the Monsanto bovine growth hormone controversy to get an idea.

Enjoy!